Freedomwriter.com Logo
Special Interest

Note: Links to other sites will open in a new window.
FOR CURRENT NEWS & COMMENTARY IN BETWEEN ISSUES, PLEASE CHECK EACH LINK
IN THE LOWER LEFT HAND COLUMN OR VIEW THE GUEST FORUM SECTION THRU
FREEDOMWRITER'S IKONBOARD.
About Us About Us
Advertising Advertising
Archive Archive
Art & Literature Art & Literature
Classifieds Classifieds
Commentary Commentary
Contact Us Contact Us
Guestbook Guestbook
Guest Forum Guest Forum
Headline News Headline News
Letters to the Editor Letters to the Editor
Opinion Poll Opinion Poll
Our Links Our Links
Quotations Quotations
Trading Post Trading Post
Home Home


Recommend This Website

911 LIES: WTC JET ENGINE CONFIRMED NOT FROM BOEING 767

Jon Carlson
Submitted by Don Stacey
Apr. 4, 2005

So Popular Mechanics, shilling for the government, says photo of engine found outside WTC tower was from a Boeing 767. It isn't. Just another 911 lie.

Don Stacey


Popular Mechanics, while mentioning that an engine from the South Tower airliner landed in the street, neglected to show an engine photo, engine street location, and engine positive identification. Just by identifying undamaged parts from the damaged engine positive identification of the engine was made in the article: However, the engine identified, a CFM56, is the primary engine of the Boeing 737 not the Boeing 767 alleged to have struck the South Tower.

Shortly after the article was posted, a Boeing 767 airliner mechanic emailed that he concurred with the engine identification and that it was not from a Boeing 767.

Excerpts from his email:

I am an A&P mechanic for a major airline. I overhaul 767's. The engines are NOT from a 767. No 767 in existence uses CFM56's. Not enough power to lift a '67.

THOSE ENGINES ON THE STREET IN NEW YORK DID NOT COME OFF A 767.

Engine location. Church & Murray Street. CLICK FOR IMG AND REST OF STORY:

Original Post

Back to Specials Page

(Enhanced for Netscape)


Proud to be Alaskan
Web Alaska Copyright © 2004. All Rights Reserved