I am forwarding this response for your consideration. It pertains to only a part of the message previously sent. The rest of the message, it seems to me, is quite important independent of the issue of "Excellency."
RE: His "Excellency" Dubya? What a RIOT - eh?
The assumptions in the piece you sent (copied below) have got it ALL backwards.
Everything is NOT as it seems, nor as we have been told!
The term His Excellency is reserved for members of the Corps Diplomatiqué !!!
Now-a-days it is a matter of respect between APPOINTEES (in the service of monarchies, governments or whatever ...) and NOT a Title of the NOBILITY, as many have wrongly assumed.
Also the APPOINTED Ambassador's to the UN are also called "Your or His or Her Excellency".
The fact that GWB was FORMALLY INTRODUCED - in public and 'on the record' - as "His Excellency" is VERY interesting and crucial, but NOT for the reasons most people (and certainly conspiracy theorists) assume.
Everyone that has gone to Diplomatic School knows this.
After Gulf War I, his father's Triumphal Tour of the Middle East, Kingdoms, Principalities and governments involved the ancient tradition of collecting the 'gratuity' or 'payola' or 'kick-backs' or 'back-handers' for ejecting the mutual enemy - Saddam - out of Kuwait by eliminating his potential threat to grab pro-West oil producing nations in the region.
Well, AFTER the latest so-called GULF war II, (but not really - as Formal War was not Mutually Declared - nor is the so-called 'war' on terror' for that matter) - not one nation in the Middle East invited Dubya to do a repeat of his daddies 'tour' (aside from the massive 'security' problems - and riots that could have just 'unsettled' the entire region .).
So, after the 'defeat' of Iraq, Her Majesty Elizabeth, GRANTED GWB the Title of "Her Regent" (meaning recognizing Her Governor General of Her rogue colony known as the USA.
Remember. Britain has NEVER Declared War on the USA, but merely made contracts with said USA known as Treaties - that the said USA routinely breaks. Remember 1812 etc. ???).
So, Dubya was merely 'tacked on' or attaché (d) to Her Majesties Diplomatic Corps as an Ambassador at Large or whatever) with Her Sovereign Diplomatic Immunities guaranteed, so George II could have His little (kind-of) "Triumphal Tour" in Great Britain!
Remember this too, appearances and perceptions are EVERYTHING!!!
"BUT WHY would HM Elizabeth ever do that", one may ask?
So that no COURT in Europe could 'do a Pinochet' on George, (like Judge Garzon did from ROYAL Spain) and have George arrested for the illegal attack on Iraq (and other War Crimes). FIND: for the latest on Pinochet.
For what it's worth, the Italians are after Kissinger - over the Moro and P2 Affairs. The last time he visited London he was about 15 minutes ahead of a secret Court Writ to have him "Pinoche'd" too.
Now, get this. Ancient LAW. COURT, BAR, MAGISTRATES. Law Lords etc. are all in league together - as all COURTS are derived from the various ROYAL Courts of Europe's Monarchies/Kingdoms. They are ALL GRANTED into existence - including the Royal BAR members (color-of-law) COURTS in the (occupied) USA! HINT. FIND: The Gold Fringe on Old Glory and 'Law of the Flag'.
If you can find the photos of Dubya in Britain last fall, you will see that His Excellency was all dressed up in a BLUE penguin suit - complete with the ceremonial SASH - denoting His Granted Sovereign and Diplomatically IMMUNE Status.
ALSO FIND: Article 13. Vienna Conventions.
Formally INTRODUCING George Walker Bush, as His Excellency TELLS THE WORLD HE GWB is diplomatically immune. EOS.
Texposé PS. You may care to forward this to your contacts and lists, so that this common misunderstanding can be brought to the proper (and VERY REAL) context.